Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Coming to America Critique


Film Critique of:

Coming to America

            After watching the 1988 film “Coming to America” directed by John Landis I was pleasantly surprised. I was looking for a funny, late 80s movie to compare the humor and production techniques to that of modern day comedies. My final results were much different then I though they would be. A brief summary of the film will put some of my opinions into context. I will continue with analyzing some of the films elements and how they were conveyed throughout the film. Finishing the critique I will describe how the director was able to use the films elements in a way that worked for this film.   

            The opening scene of Coming to America starts with the main character, Prince Akeem, played by Eddie Murphy, waking up on his 21st birthday. Akeem is the prince of a fictitious African country and has every part of his daily life done for him. Even though he is pampered with rose petals before he walks anywhere, has his clothes put on for him, his teeth brushed, even his rear end whipped for him when he uses the bathroom, he is tired of his extravagant lifestyle. Being that he is now 21, his parents are forcing him to be married even if he is not ready. Akeem tells his parents he would like to travel to America to find a wife and live a normal life. Akeem along with his friend and loyal servant, travel to Queens, New York to find the cheapest most low rent housing possible. They then get a job at a local fast food restaurant and start out as cleaning attendants. Akeem meets the restaurant owner’s daughter and starts to fall in love with her even though she is involved with another man. Akeem is successful in winning her heart without her knowing that he is a prince. When Akeem’s father, king of their nation, shows up unannounced to find what wife Akeem has chosen, Akeem’s secret gets out. Akeem’s love finds out he is lying to her she runs away to try and escape Akeem, his family, and his money. But just as in every love movie the man chases after the girl, which happens to be a subway train, and pronounces his love to her. Akeem then takes his new lover back to his home country and marries the woman of his dreams. The premise of this movie is you have to look to find true love and sometimes you have to take yourself out of your element to discover it.

            There are many key elements of this film I would like to address. I will start with the ones I don’t like and continue on with the ones that I did like. The acting was nothing out of the ordinary. It was a late 1980s comedy with mediocre actors besides the great Eddie Murphy; who played several roles through out the film. This has come to be what seems like Mr. Murphy’s famous callings. Being able to play multiple characters but all be in the same scene together. In the various characters he did play he did a good comedic job but it wasn’t anything he is going to win an Oscar for.  As for the other characters they were believable but again, not great. As for the cinematography, it was somewhat like the acting. Just mediocre! There was a mixture of close ups and long shots that kept the plot physically moving forward but it was not a ground breaking performance at all. The lighting was low lit and however I was able to always see the characters perfectly fine, it wasn’t anything special. I understand why these parts were probably not the most important part of the film because I feel like they were making a comedy. It does not have to have amazingly beautiful and colorful cinematography and the actors don’t have to be the best either. I believe the focus was on the soundtrack, the costumes, and the set.

            In addition to the things I did not like I was happily surprised with some other elements of the film. One of the first things I really liked about the film was the set/setting. At first it looks cheesy and you can immediately tell that it was made in a Hollywood studio and was not shot on some exotic location. But when you really start to notice the imagination and craftsmanship of the set its really quite interesting. For example in the beginning of the movie, it shows Prince Akeem’s massive and extremely lavish home. It starts in his bedroom where all the walls are beautifully painted and the floor a extravagant marble. What really got me was all of the frosted glass with pictures of birds and other animals in them. Also around the rest of his home everything is painted with wall murals and christened with hanging chandeliers. The rest of the movie is mostly set in the fast food restaurant where Akeem and his friend worked, which had a surprising resemblance to a McDonald’s restaurant. It is also set in their apartment, which starts with blood on the walls and rats running through the apartment (which is what Akeem wanted) and then is fixed up into a “bachelor pad” with all the newest technology and a full hot tub in the living room. Although it seemed just modern I though it took some creativity to think to put a hot tub in a low rent Queens apartment. I also thought the costumes for the movie were wonderful! I did think sometimes that Akeem and his family in their wealthy royal clothing was over the top, but then again I think it was designed that way to be comical. Prince Akeem and his father would both wear whole skinned dead animals over their shoulders or extremely large gold chains. However, in the beginning of the movie there is a ceremony held for Akeem for his 21st birthday where he is to meet his wife that he is suppose to have an arranged marriage with. Before the bride to be is shown for the first time she has a large group of talented African dancers choreograph a sophisticated ritual dance before her entrance. I was very impressed with the dance but I though the costumes of the dancers was the real gem. They were wearing beautiful feathered headdresses with decorated tops and loincloths. These costumes may not have been culturally correct but it was extremely entertaining to watch and added to the over all effect of the scene. Over all what impressed me the most was the soundtrack. Various artists composed the music but some of it was extremely well written. It really surprised me to be honest. There was some music that was used from the modern day but most of it was symphony orchestrated. Because it was about a man coming from Africa, most of the music had heavy bongo drums and a thick beat with a groovy jungle feel to it. I believe it really helped the movie get through some certain scenes.

            So, how well did the director, John Landis, put all of these elements together to create a good film? In my opinion I think he did a good job. This film was not trying to be the best film of the year by any means. It was meant to be a comedy, and that’s exactly what it was. Although it is slightly different comedy from today’s standards it is still a funny movie. Compared to the movies of its time like Mel Brooks ‘Spaceballs,’ Ivan Reitman’s ‘Ghostbusters’ movies, and the ‘Back to the Future’ films its different in many ways. Eddie Murphy has a bit more vulgar comedy then most but that added to the film. Also different from the other comedies with their elaborate plots of fighting ghosts, going back in time, or space adventures ‘Coming to America’ was something simple that people could relate to. This movie exemplified something that a lot of people have experienced in their lives, moving to a new place and dealing with the language barriers and culture differences. Most people have experienced this is someway or another and that is another element that only added to the film.

            In conclusion I believe that John Landis did a good job directing Coming to America. He utilized a great actor (Eddie Murphy) that could play multiple roles, made it relatable to the general public, kept the plot simple, while at the same time investing more time in the soundtrack, costumes, and set to finish off a great comedy.

No comments:

Post a Comment